I watched a movie and it was called Night at the Museum:
Battle for the Smithsonian, directed by Shawn Levy, released in 2009. It stars
Ben Stiller, Robin Williams, Amy Adams, Hank Azaria, Owen Wilson, Steve Coogan
and Christopher Guest, to name a few. It is the sequel to Night at the Museum,
which is becoming a franchise. The story is that Benn Stiller’s character gets
rich on some inventions and has been gone from the museum as a night watchman
for a few months. He finds out that his friends the exhibits are being replaced
by digital representations and being shipped off to storage in the Smithsonian
institution in Washington, D.C. (which turns out to be a giant compound). To
make matters worse, the monkey brought the tablet that brings them to life along
and things get even worse from there. Will Larry, played by Ben Stiller, get
his friends back and save the museum?
This is a really funny movie with a lot of historical
references in it, which came as a surprise to me considering this is a family
film. For instance, Larry meets Amelia Earheart and George Custer in this
installment as well as Al Capone, Ivan the Terrible and Napoleon. The one thing I found most interesting is that
they made a point to drop some historical knowledge about Amelia Earheart, at
least two things which I certainly didn’t know, other than the obvious, that
she was lost and a pilot. Amy Adams does a great job as Amelia and really
conveys what would be her “can do” spirit. Plus there is a really funny joke
when Stiller is talking to his son to get the directions in the back room of
the museum and he says Stiller tells him he found Amelia Earheart and his kid
freaks. It was a subtle joke but still funny if you know a little about her.
Hank Azaria plays the “villain” in this as the Pharaoh, channeling some
delightful Boris Karloff as the Mummy and comes off smashing. Christopher Guest
as Ivan the Terrible is awesome as well considering he doesn’t say that much
and it’s mostly standing and looking, well, terrible. It was a real straight forward
movie that got right into the action and had some really good pacing for the
most part. I did have some issues with the incessant use of “improv” between
the characters, trying to up each other in lines, which got tedious in one or
two scenes but there isnt too much of thankfully. I wonder if it was a 105
minute Smithsonian commercial since they went to the Natural History portion
and the Air and Space portion. It doesn’t bother me since I haven’t been to
either but it just seemed like it for the most part. Then again, I like museums
so it was cool to see them running around and having adventures.
Overall, I thought it was a pretty funny sequel and it was pretty consistent with plot and very funny. There were only a few minor complaints but it is still worth seeing.
Overall, I thought it was a pretty funny sequel and it was pretty consistent with plot and very funny. There were only a few minor complaints but it is still worth seeing.
No comments:
Post a Comment